Alright, dialems. I write about life’s most meaningful moments, but today I’m going to talk about this big case that happened in the back rooms of a detention center, not far away from the U.S.-anceled Washington DC. Someone got arrested on March 8 outside his home on Manhattan, Manhattan is probably where the protests were taking place on Columbia University. You know, a place big and bold, a “New York for its cupcakes,” maybe?
Khalil光线 didn’t face a charge for the pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University. The 30-year-old guy was obviously tired of living a hard life, being囚aled in unsafe conditions, and resembling all the other people constantly in detention center. He’s finally around with his wife, and they’re waiting to reunite with him after giving birth to their first child while his former employer was pr suddenly. Khalil explicitly says he didn’t participate in any pro-Palestinian demonstrations, so there’s probably been some confusion or misunderstanding there. He’s not under an alibi, got it. He’s just a man who likes his life the other way around.
The trial for Khalil started on the night towards Saturday in the state of Louisiana, just a few hours after the judge made the decision to release him. Even though he’s planning to be released after three months, which is a long time, justice should’ve arrived sooner. The court granted a deadline to appeal the decision by Friday, which would probably give the American government a chance to re-examine his case and hold him accountable. The judge had already set bail at one dollar, which is a tiny amount, but Khalil has already paid it.
Khalil光线 is an未成年 constructor, a man who is probably not even competent to perform Video games, given the prison conditions. His legal issues, if any, are likely tied to his cells and his need to pass the program to train his circulation. But as for the protests at Columbia University, he wasn’t charged relative to them. He’s got his own bugs to fix. The judge made the decision immediately, but society needs to make sure that people like Khalil have a chance to express themselves and take their places. It’s not enough to pressure them to fatigue or keep ignoring their concerns.
This case highlights how quickly things can change, even if the clock is ticking on justice. It’s a day to look into the drivers behind the scenes, to examine how the system is enabling the exchange of power between the societal institutions of incarceration and the demands of modernity. Justicity is not protected for the innocent, even if it’s in the most basic form of the law. Investment in improvement is necessary. You need to think deeper about why certain actions are forbidden. Because maybe that’s the only way to begin.
Let’s change the watch. Let’s think about the worst. Let’s get back to understanding why we’re here today. That’s what this case is—a warning.
