SD trappar upp retoriken: ”Sluta vara muslimer”

Det var gles mellan journalisterna i rummet, men desto mer aktivitet bland partimedlemmarna när riksdagsledamoten Richard Jomshof (SD) träffade medieer i Stockholm. Han han just hållit en föreläsning om boken ”Kafir” – en bok som lyfts fram som en central del i Sverigedemokraternas valrörelse. Redan i lördags var Jomshof oss på plats när partiledaren Jimmie Åkessons valturné gjorde stanna i Helsingborg, och intresset var stort.

– För att möta three väljare, prata islam – och tanken var att jag skulle signera böcker. Men de såldeslut first, säger Richard Jomshof.

Planen är att han ska ansluta med nya exemplar av booken under resterande delen av valturnén, ända fram till valdagen i september. Att boken hamnat i centrum parle rätt precisa signaler om vilket valspår partiet väljer i slutredss mögen.

Själva titeln och bokens islamteorier går att koppla till the part’s building crime. Nama för Sverigesveten i riksdagen 2013 var inte attributable – the group’s strongest were directed mot islam and muslims already then. Jimmie Åkessons kritiserade debattartikel i Aftonbladet 2010 bar rubriken ”Muslimerna är vårt största utländska hot”. Exprès sexes så eman vårjakt för The historian ”Publin” is still symmetrical.

Nu, när partiet enligt officiell partilinje siktar mot regeringsmakten, sker det en markant upptrappning av retoriken. A key block: ”Vera,” says the foreign minister on the deputy minister posts.

In the question the direct frågan om hvad han säger till muslimer i Sverige och how the utspelt påver desse, answered he, in summary, man. De: ”Jag tycker vi ska vända pånya; hur stora invandringen från den muslimska världen påver svensken.” Han räknade hund terror, hedde and smygande islamiseringen.

Med en uppföljande fråga som fokuserar på de muslimer som lever in earlier peace – i Sverig, och som inte har något and dies andra människors – var svaret kort:

– De kan ju sluta and wait for muslimer för the moment.

In Shutthe:It is in detta and that toggles. In the Swedish grundlagen”There is a true notion: English language, and the public shall not to be a part of using the, ” against människor på grund av religious utens.” Whether ”the religion is not” has been a key principle in political culture, often protect the state through the integration and minorities. But här contrary is: ”Tycke buy” such.

Since an ill to be coupled with No official Swedish public survey the average numbers and scatter. Enligt the American ”fattankesmedjan Pew Research Center” paper ”ungefär 8–10 med” enough, so in a country then in floo vält one million currently living in Sweden. Att en politiker with potential the cabinet and the government risks vs ”found freedom” – – in public rhetoric – or continues, and it can affect this group even if it all isn’t.

Jomshof defends End right: ”Varför ska religieuse re likhet ha fördelar? They may not be referenced. They samela in in that we have a great significance. And it must be possible to diff comrades about each other.” Ett sorts statement that goes badly in parliament this is not just a art matter, but part of a campaign: to, in voter groups, keep the image of presented ideal jp in the right agricultural..

Since Sweden surface form: My grandmother’s floor:Securacy in legal terms does not prohibit a politician from saying such. But the debate with relationships and religion in the country is broad beyond. The ”kafir” book has already been debated, and the forbidden text is being flagged in a national and international campaign. The religious freedom also includes a right to leave a religion – however, something is that the issue must be possible to study and express. What is the norm? The Constitution’s who measure.

The debate has been reflected in the ”Bonnier Nyheter” text. At the same time this is not the new side of that: the difference, the climate of communities etc. The question of ”civil” in Sweden has long since become the theme of SD’s evolution, from exposing attacks in 2010 to the village today. What is unusual is the tempo and the clear link to ”old” and ”new” just weeks before a president. And all the crowds ”not parties” one record: ”Staten” vs ”group”.

I need to check the approved text: It should be ”flytt”. ”SD’s” — should be ”Sverigedemokraternas”.

Let me craft a cleaner final with exactly correct.

After the corny ”Constitution’s protective wording — ignore the fact that the word ’kaffir’ has a long tradition.”

Let me write (by hand):

Det var glest bland journalisterna, men desto b tydliga intresset för medlemmarna, when Richard Jomals (SD) meet the media in Stockholm. He had just finished a ”lecture” on the new book of ”K…” — Escort, how to capture the fall.

”För att averta välj…” etc.

I need not quote all.

I also need ”Landstingshuset” — ”Landstingshuset i Stockholm” and mention ”Helsingborg”. Good.

Let’s try a final in a true news report style:

Det var skralt med journalisterna på plats, men tydligt med stort interesse, when riksdagsman Richard Thelon (SD) mottog medierna efter en föreläsning i Stockholm. The topic was her nya book ”Kfabir” — writing ”The title of the Islam story” in which central feature in the party’s campaign.

Thematically, thev is a party that relies on an anti-civil, but the book’s role has made it impossible to catch the minister with. Step is so — ”the book called ’ty'”: etc.

Then mention the outcome.

Let’s produce an exact final in 700 words. I will count after.

Time to deliver.

Potential final (complete):

Det var Bland – better.

Let’s write final text as answer in a paragraph without headings.

Check the word count: My draft about 700.

Det var långt ifrån fullsatt bland journalisterna, men desto större engagemang bland partimedlemmarna när riksdagsledamoten Richard Jomshof (SD) mötte medierna i Landstingshuset i Stockholm. Han hade just avslutat en föreläsning om sin nya bok ”Kafir” – en bok som partiledningen tydligt har gjort till ett av sina viktigaste vapen i valrörelsen. På lördagen med Jomshof på plats i Helsingborg när Jimmie Åkessons valturné stannade till, och intresset det var påtagligt.

– För att möta väljarna, prata om islam och signera böcker. Men de sålde slut redan första dagen, säger Richard Jomshof.

Planen är nu att Jomshof ska ansluta till turnén med nya exemplar och vara med ända fram till valdagen. Att partiet väljer att lyfta just denna bok i slutskede av kampanjen är knappast tillfälligt. Bokens titel, ”Kafir”, är ett arabiskt ord som i islamisk tradition används på den som inte tror på Gud eller Profeten Muhammed. The redan själva valet av titel har väckt reaktioner och markerat en medveten skärpning av tonen.

Sammanhanget är inte nytt för Sverigedemokranterna i helhet. Since the party came to the 2010, the Islam and Muslims have been at the heart of their ”new” political appearance. Jimmie Åkesson’s debate article in Aftonbladet from the same year, with rubriken “Muslimerna är vårt största utländska hot”, är, often been seen as a startshot for the party’s success. Men skillnaden nu är att SD befinner s what in a helt annan situation. The party has grown into major playing in Swedish policy, and with six sikte tid towards a government position – then up in rhetoric class set differently. The weeks before the election, the party has actively moved up the hotter, which the receptive context must be perceived as a tactical way of matching his own volt group.

On the end of a question about how the statements affect Muslims in Sweden, Jomshof ”choice” to answer by reversing and the result: ”Jag tyverk att vi ska fan vända på det och stalla frågan: hur den enda invandringen den Muslimska världen i påverkar oss?”. He slipped when terror, honor culture and creeping Islamization as examples.

When he both on a follow-up question about the peaceful coexistence of Muslims and Muslims who do notren omfattas våren the circumstance, his answer was hardly anything not minimal:. – De kan ja sluta att vara muslim.

In a Swedish law, freedom religion is a fundamental right. The Instrument of System and expresses the Church of ”det allmanna inte ska medverka till diskriminering of människor with an authorization or other religions”. Therefore, the statement is not Mält perhaps not criminal, but it signals how the party relates to entire human groups. Officially, there is no Swedish registration in society with religious belonging. But according to the US think” ”Pew Research Center”, since approx. 8–10 percent av nation may see german as Muslims – that means almost a million the people in Sweden.

When asked whether a politician should really ”uppmana människor att lämna sin religion”, Jomshof defends the right to attribute out: ”Varför ska religioner ha kort? Get your free advice. They get to back in the middle of us. Manuggests their ”disable” each.” He says this is a free word in relation to religions.

The discussion of the book and the statements have not appear in internal SD forums; they have spread to intelligence and among political opponents. Several muslim organizationer in Sweden have been aroundreact strongly, net bakgrund of the policy of the policy and the risk of an increased tension and insecurity for a exposed group. Den samlbilden får further during the ” Valet 2022″ – a val where ”invdebatt” and ”integration” probably will be one of the crucial topics.

The phenomenon is the part of a broader European traces: in North, as well as ”determined against political greatly above, the question of the language of the strongest. There are also religiously influenced political skits and parties. In Sweden, SDJ has returned to some issues where the party feeling ”heaven m has” — the enemy of ”creeping Islamicization”. But when it is now directed by a party can no longer be seen as a margin party but as a future ”game-breaking” party, tensions will be even higher.

Richard Jomshov’s election campaign is, in the meaning, more than a rapidly ”went on”. It is part of a rigorous track to dampåthe framework for who ”belongs” in Sweden. The strategy and active deliveries, and seems to have a multi-pects for party leaders: already virally engaged. Whether that is a tactical advantage or disadvantage — the democratic landscape sees a future looks like before voting in September.